CurioWire
EXTRA! EXTRA!

🌍 Records from the halls of power

The Bloop Sound Explained by NOAA and Icequakes

worldPublished 19 May 2026 | Updated 01 Jun 2026
The Bloop Sound Explained by NOAA and Icequakes
Hydrophone arrays on deck | Image by Credit Line: AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Gift of Bill Woodward, USNS Kane Collection, CC0
Quick Summary
  • What: NOAA recorded the Bloop in 1997, and researchers later concluded it was most likely a large icequake rather than a biological sound.
  • Where: The South Pacific, monitored through NOAA’s underwater hydrophone network.
  • When: 1997.

In 1997, NOAA recorded a powerful ultra-low-frequency sound in the South Pacific. It became known as the Bloop, and for a while, it was treated like one of the ocean’s great mysteries.

How NOAA Recorded the Bloop

The sound was picked up by hydrophones operated by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as part of a system designed to monitor underwater acoustics across huge distances. What made the Bloop stand out was its scale. It was loud enough to be detected thousands of kilometers apart, and its audio profile sounded unusual when converted into a form people could hear. That gap between raw data and human imagination is part of why the sound took on a life of its own.

Early public discussion often drifted toward dramatic explanations. But NOAA’s interpretation moved in a different direction. After comparing the signal with other recorded ocean sounds, researchers concluded that the Bloop was consistent with a large icequake: the sound of ice cracking, fracturing, or grinding, likely associated with Antarctic ice activity. In other words, the source was probably geophysical, not biological.

NOAA Icequake Explanation

That did not make the finding less important. It made it more useful. The Bloop became a clear example of how strange natural signals can be misread when they are stripped of context. Underwater sound travels differently than sound in air, and the ocean is full of low-frequency noise from ice movement, earthquakes, marine life, ships, and storms. A signal that seems bizarre in isolation can look much more ordinary once it is placed beside a larger acoustic record.

The real insight is not that scientists “debunked” a sea monster story. It is that the story was never the evidence. The evidence was a low-frequency signal, and the interpretation changed as researchers compared patterns, locations, and known physical processes. That is a quieter process than a mystery headline, but it is also how ocean science actually works.

Why the Bloop Still Matters

So the Bloop now stands as less of a legend than a reference point. A sound once framed as an unknown deep-sea anomaly helped sharpen how NOAA and other researchers classify remote ocean noises, especially those tied to ice dynamics in the Southern Ocean and across the Pacific listening network.

Did You Know?

NOAA’s hydrophone system was originally designed for long-range underwater acoustics monitoring, which means it could pick up sounds across thousands of kilometers.

Related questions